BROADCASTING VS. DIGITAL TRANSITION: HOW TERRESTRIAL PLATFORMS AND NEW STREAMING GIANTS INNOVATE

Broadcasting vs. Digital Transition: How Terrestrial Platforms and New Streaming Giants Innovate

Broadcasting vs. Digital Transition: How Terrestrial Platforms and New Streaming Giants Innovate

Blog Article

Terrestrial broadcast series have long been established as popular TV programs, produced and broadcast through terrestrial broadcasting stations. In contrast, streaming services are digitally distributed streaming platforms, with Netflix, here Watcha, and domestic platforms being representative examples. As media consumption habits evolve, competition between terrestrial dramas and OTT services has intensified. Consequently, each platform is developing unique content and employing distinct strategies to strengthen its competitiveness.

Differentiation Strategies of Terrestrial Dramas

Terrestrial broadcast series focus on providing stories with high mass appeal while maintaining time-honored formats. In particular, they actively cast renowned leads to boost ratings and produce narratives that capture the interest of a diverse demographic, thereby securing a broad viewer base. Additionally, leveraging their historical credibility and brand trust, they continue to deliver time-tested formulas, ensuring reliable audience numbers. This allows audiences to have multiple options to engage with network television through various distribution channels.

Differentiation Strategies of OTT Services

OTT providers are expanding their market by employing strategies distinct from network-based television. Firstly, they actively embrace new genres and innovative storytelling, prioritizing artistic direction and cinematic quality over mainstream success. Secondly, they provide personalized selections that meets the needs of specific interests, targeting niche audiences. Lastly, they focus on producing globally accessible media aimed at the worldwide audience, allowing them to secure viewers not only within their region but also across different cultures. Through these methods, OTT services are building industry dominance in ways unlike legacy channels.

Competition and Collaboration Between Platforms

As legacy media companies increasingly expand into the digital entertainment industry, competition has escalated. For instance, one of Korea’s leading networks and a long-established broadcaster operate their own streaming platforms, 'KBS Streaming Hub' and 'wavve', respectively, providing their existing TV shows on internet-based distribution channels. This effort helps sustain the relevance of established TV channels while engaging modern audiences. Meanwhile, the growth of new media services is shifting audience preferences towards more user-controlled content access.

Conversely, OTT services are also enhancing their competitiveness by working alongside legacy content producers. A leading global streaming giant has gained massive international recognition with Korean dramas like the breakout survival thriller and 'Hellbound', leveraging the storytelling expertise of terrestrial broadcasters. This synergy helps both parties leverage their advantages, fostering a more dynamic industry. As a result, the lines between terrestrial and digital platforms continue to become less defined.

Ultimately, legacy TV series and streaming platforms are both rivaling each other and working together through their respective market tactics. network-produced content maintain traditional genres and general audience focus, whereas OTT services provide bold and cross-border content. As synergy and merging between these platforms continue to develop, audiences can expect a wider-ranging and enriched content environment in the future.

Report this page